Nov 202007
 

I’m feeling put upon this afternoon. I’m feeling offended. And I know I shouldn’t. But I am. I’ll blame late-pregnancy super-sensitive hormones, a lack of sleep and a strong desire for more Starbucks but an inability to shove myself into the car to drive and go get some. Partly irrational, I do agree but… really, I have to ask: why is okay to assume the worst of birth parents but, to flip it, never okay to assume the worst of adoptive parents? Why the double standard?

Someone asked in a forum setting a question that, by itself, doesn’t make me feel offended. But when I sit and think about it on the grand scale of things, I am miffed. I’m tired of the double standard. The question in question?

“Have any (of you) birth parents turned to drugs to deal with the loss of your child?”

The question is a legitimate one when you consider the complexities of grief and loss. As our society doesn’t deal really well with grief and loss and we are thus often ill-prepared to handle the issues when they are thrown in our path, poor coping mechanisms are not out of the question. And so, part of me understands the question. My answer, of course, is no. I know a few others who have turned to drugs or alcohol because therapy was simply not available. (I mean, it took me three-plus years to find a therapist with experience!) They have acknowledged that masking the grief with the feel-good effects of drugs and/or alcohol didn’t solve anything but it’s all they knew to do at the time.

Okay, so, it happens. We acknowledge that. But my question is: why the double standard on talking about these issues? I want to post the following question:

“Have you, as an adoptive parent, turned to drugs or alcohol to deal with the grief and loss associated with infertility or miscarriage or the rigors of parenting in general?”

Can you imagine the flame war that would begin? Can you imagine the absolute anger that would be felt by that entire side of the triad for such an awful assumption? And yet, I know a mother who did turn to drugs when she was dealing with infertility. It’s not her proudest moment and she has since been through rehab and is a great, great friend to me. We know it happens. But why isn’t it okay to ask?

Why is it okay to ask about birth parents and an assumed tendency to cope with things poorly but not okay to flip the question? I’m not saying we shouldn’t be asking about birth parents who have coped poorly; I think we should! I think we should be discussing the why’s and where-for’s of these detrimental coping mechanisms so that future birth parents aren’t sucked into their evil grasp. We should acknowledge that they exist and make plans to help those currently struggling and those who might come along in the future. But should we be ignoring the other side of the coin? Simply because people assume that adoptive parents have it all together? I don’t think so.

All I’m saying is: issues are not unique to one group of parents. Birth parents aren’t the only ones who deal in poor ways. We’re just expected to because of stereotype and long-standing stigmas.

And if you do have a drug or alcohol problem, oh, please, reach out. You can beat this. I promise you!

 Posted by at 12:44 pm
Nov 042007
 

I think I’ll expand on this on the birth/first parent blog next week. But I need to “free write” on this recent choice phrase on a certain forum discussion with regard to a mother’s decision to place her child for adoption. Twice now, the decision to relinquish has been referred to as an “awesome out.” (QuietlyMothering hit on the topic on her blog the other day after the initial offense.)

I was initially so shocked that all I could say was, “Did you really just refer to adoption as an awesome out?” Because I was honestly flabbergasted. Granted, the member to this forum was new. But still. You don’t often see such a blatant disregard for the emotional complexities of placement. Okay, maybe you do. But it’s been awhile for me. And it was disturbing on many levels.

And so, someone else chimed in with “OMGZ! ABORTION IS TEH EVIL SO OF COURSE ADOPTION IS AN AWESOME OUT!” Really, I’m so tired of the adoption-abortion comparision melarchy. It smacks of a complete lack of education on the matter. I know plenty of pro-life women who are intelligent enough to know the difference between the two and to realize that adoption is not the answer to the “abortion problem.” And so when I’m presented with those who can’t seem to separate the two, again, my mind turns to mush.

And so, to dissect the idea that adoption is any kind of out, I will provide a list of reasons that doesn’t work for me:

1. I wanted to parent my daughter so badly. I was not looking for an out.

2. Since certain circumstances and people were getting in the way of my original desire to parent, I made the decision that I wanted to be in my daughter’s life (through open adoption). That decision was a lifelong commitment that I made to her and her family. If I would have been looking for an out of any kind, I would have signed the paper and walked away. Even still, that doesn’t remove the point I’m about to make.

3. Just because I ended up signing over the rights to my child doesn’t mean that I stopped loving her, worrying about her or caring about her well-being. She is forever on my mind and in my heart. I cannot simply and magically remove her from my being. She altered who I am in so many different and glorious ways. Termination of rights has nothing to do with termination of love. Nothing at all.

4. Even if something was to happen that closed our adoption, I would never be free from my daughter. She is a piece of my being. With that door closed, I would just be even less of my whole person.

I’m just not understanding where this idea is coming from other than a blatant disregard for the experience of first mothers. The decision to place was agonizing and horrifying. The physical separation was excruciating. The signing of the TPR was humiliating. (Doubly so since I was forced to do it twice.) And the continued presence I have in her life is sometimes emotionally and physically draining. But I do it because I was looking for a way to be “IN” her life.

Not out. IN.

 Posted by at 1:29 am