Nov 282011
 

They don’t seem to learn, do they?

There I was, minding my own business, not even planning on blogging on Chronicles today (or this week, or… well…), when a comment came in on an old post from March of this year. Odd, I thought. I figured it was spam. It was better than spam!

It was an adoption agency worker! Swell.

You can view the thread that Heidi from Adoptions from the Heart decided to crash, get name-cally, get angry and then seemingly apologize for at the end in its entirety over on the original post. What’s not on the post is her email that she sent after she faux-apologized. So we’ll put it here.

You say that you would only delete a comment or get upset if someone was personally attacking your family. The negative rumors on your blog are attacking my family. Not my work family but my actual family. I have no problem with people sharing their opinions and I expect to hear negative feedback occasionally. I hear lots of good feedback as well. Maxine is my mother, she founded this agency, so when I read false rumors being spread through the internet it is like a personal attack. Negative feedback is one thing rumors are another. I would have completely understood if you had taken that comment and investigated it and if you found something posted your findings but to put it out there the way it is hurts not only the agency and my family but also those families and women who are working with us. I apologize for not leaving information and moving on – the comments are getting out of hand and they are turning into an attack on me personally now . You want to protect those who feel free to post on your site and have it be a safe place for them to express themselves, yet I am being blasted for expressing mine.

I share that so everyone doesn’t think that the discussion ended with her “apology.”

Because my blogging ethics were called into question, let’s take a closer look at the ethical train wreck that is Adoptions from the Heart.

Want to know my Number One Reason for Hating Adoption Agencies? And it’s not how they treat or mistreat birth parents. It’s treating children like a commodity and, more specifically, treating non-white children like a lesser commodity. That’s right: Adoptions from the Heart charges different prices by race.

From their “domestic minority” pdf (as a warning, the monetary breakdown of how much children cost night make you sick):

Placement fees for African-American children are subsidized due to the great need for families to adopt children of this heritage. Placement fees can be found on our fee schedules. Fees and costs for the program are based on the fee schedule in effect at the time services are provided.

And, it gets even better from their FAQ:

8. We have wonderful biological children and want to adopt in order to give a child a home, do we have to be infertile to adopt?
Not necessarily. Currently there are less available Caucasian infants than there are families requesting to adopt them. Therefore AFTH will not be accepting applications for our Caucasian adoption program from families who are able to conceive a biological child. However, there is a need for families for African-American children in the US and many International adoption programs that allow families with children to adopt.

And so, in short, you can have yourself a black or biracial baby for cheaper! And if you can have your “own” babies, well then, you can still get one of our cheaper African American babies! See! We’re doing you a favor.

So, let’s get down to it if we’re going to talk about ethics, information sharing and the adoption industry. Suz saying, in the comments of a post specifically asking for information about adoption agencies, that she had unsubstantiated information and that it was hearsay was not an unethical discussion. Me asking for more information, but not following up because the couple adopting found out the unethical race issues in this post before I could even share the original post with them, is not an ethical misstep on my part. What was an unethical misstep on my part was not going back to the original post an letting all readers know that Adoptions from the Heart treats children of AA heritage as though they are somehow less than.

Price breakdowns by race are disgusting. (Of course, price breakdowns for any adoption at all really rub me the wrong way, but by race is horrifying. This is 2011, darn near 2012.) I don’t want justifications like “biracial babies are harder to place” or any such nonsense. Stop doing it. It’s wrong. It’s ugly. And, when it comes down to it, it’s just about the almighty dollar for the agencies. It’s not about “finding homes for the harder to place biracial children.” It’s about agencies knowing that they can charge more for white babies; it’s about knowing how to make more money.

And it’s disgusting.

Call me unhappy. Call me upset. But call a spade a spade: Adoptions from the Heart isn’t concerned with ethical adoption. They’re only concerned about “rumors” on the Internet and how they may or may not be perceived by those considering adoption. The truth, not the rumor, is this: Charging different prices for race is unethical. End of discussion.

 Posted by at 2:14 pm  Tagged with:
Mar 152011
 

Sometimes I push myself too far.

I got an email informing me of a conference call held by Lifetime Adoption with Mardie Caldwell about her new book, Called to Adoption. I jokingly forwarded it to Dawn about how I should call in. She laughed and told me to do it. I missed the beginning of the call because I was just getting home from the gym, but called in anyway.

Wow.

I can tell you that they didn’t expect that a birth mother was going to call in and listen. Which is what I figured when I called in. This was a call about how to adopt and why adoption is good and how waiting to start your family because of fears (of any reason) isn’t the way to go. Now, those things, in an of themselves, are not bad. There are ethical ways to adopt. Ethical adoption can be good. And delaying the start of your family because of fears — of any reason — is sad. But this call was not about ethical adoption. At all. And if they had known that a (very vocal) birth mother was listening in, I surely hope that they would have changed their tone.

But they didn’t know I was there. So they were candid.

Mardie Caldwell was talking when I tuned in. And this is what I first heard.

“As a woman, I can’t understand her giving away her flesh and blood. I had lost so many.”

Long story short, Mardie was matched with a mother. In the hospital, she told the mother to really make sure this was what she wanted. On the way to the airport, Caldwell again stated that. Upon returning home, the birth mother and birth father married. The birth mother and birth father then asked for the baby back within her. It was within her decision period to revoke consent. Caldwell fought.

“God kept showing me scripture that said this baby was supposed to be with me.”

She went on about the fight. Caldwell was out of town twice when the birth parents flew in for the baby.

“I felt like Mary and Joseph on the donkey.”
(and later)
“He wants Christians families for these babies.”

Now, before anyone gets a bee in their bonnet, I do identify as a Christian. We raise our sons with a love of Jesus — and all people. Including those people who happen to get pregnant “out of wedlock.” We are big on compassion and understanding and — gasp — ethics. So when people use religion — of any sort — to talk about how babies don’t belong with their original families, I get kind of twitchy. “Christian” adoptive families are not entitled to other mothers’ babies. There’s no ifs, ands or buts about that one.

In the end, Caldwell “won” the child (who is now grown and has no contact with his original family — despit Caldwell’s “permission”).

“A lot of what we went through, we helped other people avoid these problems.”

What Caldwell (and Lifetime Adoption) didn’t expect when Caldwell made that statement is that is why this blog, right here, exists. I will always have the loss of my daughter with me. My unethical non-agency (ANLC) helped to create this blog by the lies they told me and by the way they treated me like a second class citizen. I continue to speak out about agencies like them and warn others that they can avoid being treated like dirt. Ethical agencies do exist (I’m working on a post, per some recent contacts from various people — love you all). You do not have to sell yourself — or your baby — short if adoption is your ultimate goal. You don’t have to tolerate being treated like you are “less than” an adoptive family.

“You know what it’s like and you know how it feels for adoptive parents.”

She’s referring to how she helps others. But you don’t know how it feels for a birth parent. You have no clue. The comments you made? You have absolutely no clue. The grief and loss are lifelong. There’s no magic day or moment when the feelings just dissipate. That — right there — is why I loathe so many adoption agencies. You have no idea what we’re feeling, what we go through. And then she said…

“I know the pain she went through.”

No. You don’t. At all. You don’t know. At all. The fact that you kept saying “my birthmom” is proof. She’s not your birth mom. She’s your son’s birth mother. She is not yours. Her pain is your gain.

I had to bail before the end of the call, when they started questions from listeners. I wanted to say, “How do you sleep at night.”

Here’s the truth, broken down in simple terms:

It is unethical to fight for and eventually keep a child whom the birth parents are contesting said adoption.

End of story.

Okay, I’ll grant adoptive parents one concession: It is unethical to keep said baby if the birth parents contest during their legal revocation period. I can’t morally say that I would approve of a birth parent trying to fight for a child twelve years down the road. But if a birth parent follows the laws within their state (as revocation periods differ in each state) and contest the adoption within their allotted time, there is no question. You should return the child. I don’t care if you think she “doesn’t have enough money” (as Caldwell’s own words stated) or if she’s “not Christian” or how many children you have lost (newsflash: I had a miscarriage post-relinquishment; you don’t “own” loss) or even if you suspect that they won’t care well for the child. Maybe the birth parents think you won’t care well for their child. Maybe you are the one to look at with suspect. But that doesn’t seem fair to say, now does it? So why is it okay for (potential) adoptive parents to say so?

Now, remember: Lifetime Adoption contacted me when I was pregnant with BigBrother to see if I was interested in their “services.” Prior to what we now refer to as “social media,” Lifetime Adoption contacted me when I put up a six week pregnant photo on my MySpace account. I was disgusted then. And having listened in tonight, I understand.

Mothers considering relinquishment mean nothing to Lifetime Adoption. Nothing. As long as good, “deserving,” “Christian” families get the babies, it doesn’t matter. Ask KatjaMichell.

Right before I bailed in the call, Caldwell said this:

“I am a firm believer in what goes around comes around.”

Good. Me too. I believe that treating birth parents as nothing but incubators will backfire in the long run. Eventually, ethical reform will happen and those agencies who have proven themselves to care nothing for ethics will be up the creek without a paddle. And that is one of those very rare instances in which I will say, “I told you so.”

I’m now off to do some deep breathing and yoga before bed. And to — gasp — say a prayer for my own peace, mainly so I can get some sleep tonight.

Originally posted on The Chronicles of Munchkin Land.