The newest Open Adoption Roundtable made me laugh.

We each interacted with at least one professional during the adoption process (agency, lawyer, facilitator, consultant, hospital social worker, etc.). What was one thing that they did that was most supportive of open adoption? What one thing was least supportive?

Our “agency” did nothing to support openness. Nothing.

The openness that they lead me to believe was my only option involved updates for the first year, sporadic updates through a certain age (I recall five, but it may have been seven) and then nothing. It wasn’t until my daughter’s adoptive father talked about potentially visiting after the adoption that I even came to realize that open adoptions could be fully open. It was a far-fetched idea for me at the time, and I told him I would consider it, not wanting to close the door immediately but unsure of if I could handle it. (Obviously, I came to my senses!)

What was the least supportive thing? Where do I begin?

  • Lying by omission by not informing me that open adoptions were not legally binding in our state.
  • Not providing me with pre-placement counseling that would have helped with future openness issues.
  • Not telling either adult party about the ins and outs of open adoption.
  • Not providing me with post-placement counseling when I asked for it.

The list goes on. Of course, looking at the atrocities that they are still heaving upon the adoption industry, it’s not surprising to read that list, now is it?

If it wasn’t for my therapist, that I paid for myself as my “agency” refused to help me locate or pay for one, I wouldn’t have made heads or tails of open adoption. To be fair, I was her first “fully” open adoption birth mother as well. She read books, dug into our story and worked hard to come up to speed so that she could help me figure it all out. I am grateful that at least one professional, though not specifically attached to the industry, came through for me.

People have doubted me before when I told them that the “agency” with which I worked was fantastically unethical. They don’t know the ins and outs of how I was lied to, how J and Dee were treated and the whole cluster that followed. Some of it does sound rather outlandish. I mean, how on Earth are so-called agencies allowed to blatantly lie to expectant mothers or potential adoptive families in this day in age? Surely that’s a thing of the past.

It’s not.

And so, if anyone ever needed proof that the ANLC has no ethical concern for expectant parents considering adoption, please take a gander at this. Let me screencap it for when it eventually ceases to exist, which can’t be soon enough.

In case you can’t read it, it says:

“Adoption Network Law Center is supporting MTV in casting for the new season of 16 and Pregnant.

And goes on to say:

“If you are:

  • Planning to place your baby for adoption
  • Between 15-17 years old
  • Less than 7 months pregnant

Then apply here!”

Exclamation point their own!

First and foremost, the fact that an unethical adoption facilitator (as they are not an actual agency and thus not governed by the same state laws) is helping with casting for a teen reality show is alarming. It is jarring. It is a big red flag waving in the air declaring that something is wrong with the system.

It should read:

“Hi, we’re going to use these fun graphics and colors that appeal to your teen senses to draw you in before we speak with your parents. Then we’re going to tell you great things about MTV! I mean, IMAGINE HOW FAMOUS YOU WILL BE! And then we will fill your head full of lies about how you could never possibly be enough for your child and how everything is working against you and how you’d be a bad mom. And we’ll make promises of openness even though it’s not legally binding in most states. And then we’ll give you half truths about the ins and outs of signing your rights away. And then! We won’t talk to you ever again even though we make promises of post-placement counseling. YAY! SO PLEASE APPLY NOW! MTV! SHINY THINGS!”

It goes on.

“I’m looking for a loving family to adopt my baby.”

And they won’t tell you that adoptive families divorce at the same rate. Die at the same rate. Fumble and fall in this difficult economy. You know, just like the rest of us. They’ll paint them as perfect. And, don’t get me wrong, there are gems among them. But they are all human. And they will all make mistakes. And without any help from this specific so-called agency, many will falter and fail when it comes to openness, having no support to turn to when the going gets tough. (Same goes for birth parents.)

What a deal, really. You can lose your baby and be exploited. Swell.

I have issues enough with MTV’s show. I have issues enough with adoption consistently being painted with rosy colors, ignoring the hardship that birth parents endure for decades after the physical act of relinquishment. But this blatant mocking of all things ethical in adoption is a new low for even the lowest of lows in the adoption industry. ANLC is basically laughing in the face of every expectant mother considering relinquishment, every mother who has already relinquished and every mother separated by adoption yet to come and saying, “Tell your story? We’ll sneak around and make adoption look glamorous. And then we’ll shove them over to you after we’re done.” Cackle, cackle, glee, glee.

Cases for ethical reform in the adoption industry are staring us all in the face. They’re screaming. They’re siren-blaring, arms-flailing, jumping-up-and-down in front of us. And no one seems to care.


If you are a teen who has investigated that link and would like to talk with someone (or multiple someones) about adoption, relinquishment, grief and loss, life-long impact on future children, openness and its non-enforceable nature or ANLC, please don’t hesitate to contact me. Please use my contact form and put ANLC/MTV in the subject so I don’t miss it. IP addresses are recorded.

© 2010 The Chronicles of Munchkin Land Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha