I came across a comment on another blog post recently that has been bugging me to no end. The commenter said, and I paraphrase because I’m not into the kind of linking which results in mass attacks, “Birth parents and adult adoptees make sweeping generalizations on their blogs [all the time].”
Maybe.
But so do adoptive parents. And foster parents. And, to jump out of the adoption niche for thirty seconds, so do:
Biological parents who never had to consider issues of fertility or adoption and are merely parenting the children that they gave birth to. Single parents. Two parent families. Divorced parents. Single parents. Non-parents. Stepparents. Food bloggers. Tech bloggers. Political bloggers. Entertainment bloggers. Book bloggers. Review bloggers.
The list goes on and on.
While it doesn’t justify the issue, I’d be willing to bet that you can’t find me a niche in which a blogger hasn’t made some kind of sweeping generalization that made somebody upset. Even if it only made one person upset, it still counts. Even if the blogger in question was simply writing a review about the movie and said something to the effect of “this director has absolutely no talent and every single movie he has ever made has been complete crap.” Sweeping. Even if it was a food blogger who said “anyone who cooks with x-product doesn’t care about the health of their family.” Generalization. Even if it was a political blogger who said “if you believe x, you are y.” It’s done in every niche.
It doesn’t make it right. But don’t tell me that birth parents and adoptees are the only ones guilty of such a thing. I’ve been called bitter, angry, stupid, immoral. It has been said that birth parents in open adoption are just in it for the fun. It’s been said that birth parents in open adoption are lazy. Adoptive parents have said all kinds of nasty things about birth parents, as a group, on forums and their own blogs for ages. Do I hold that against adoptive parents as a group? Do I shun adoptive parent blogs simply because they have a few bad apples? Do I ignore all adult adoptees because one doesn’t like me? Do I write off birth parent blogs because someone wrote one post, one time, in which she vented her frustration at a system that is, quite honestly, deeply flawed?
No. Instead, I work on my own issues. I try to make sure I’m not guilty of the sweeping generalization, though I will be the first to admit that I have done it before. I did it regularly at first, as I was still working through my own anger issues. More recently, I made the mistake of make a generalized statement because I used the wrong word. I referred to a group and used most instead of some to quantify a specific action/reaction. I apologized. I try not to do it again. But, really, I’m human as are all of the other bloggers out there, no matter their niche. Unless a specific blogger is purposefully and regularly degrading someone or a group of people, I really don’t have an issue with an occasional rant or even, as the case may be, a regular look at things that need to be changed.
But don’t tell me that it’s just me and my birth parent brothers and sisters. And, certainly, don’t tell me that it’s just adult adoptees. Because that statement, in itself, is a huge and offensive sweeping generalization that gets me all riled up and causes me to want to making sweeping generalizations of my own.
Hold individual bloggers responsible for their words, not an entire group.





